For Christmas I got a fascinating gift from a pal - my very own "very popular" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (excellent title) bears my name and my photo on its cover, and it has glowing reviews.

Yet it was totally composed by AI, with a couple of easy prompts about me provided by my pal Janet.

It's a fascinating read, and very funny in parts. But it also meanders rather a lot, and is someplace in between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It simulates my chatty style of composing, however it's likewise a bit recurring, and really verbose. It might have surpassed Janet's triggers in collating data about me.

Several sentences begin "as a leading innovation reporter ..." - cringe - which could have been scraped from an online bio.

There's likewise a mystical, repeated hallucination in the type of my feline (I have no animals). And there's a metaphor on nearly every page - some more random than others.

There are lots of companies online offering AI-book writing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I contacted the president Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he informed me he had sold around 150,000 customised books, mainly in the US, considering that rotating from putting together AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller expenses ₤ 26. The company uses its own AI tools to generate them, based upon an open source big language design.

I'm not asking you to buy my book. Actually you can't - only Janet, who created it, can buy any additional copies.

There is currently no barrier to anybody producing one in anybody's name, consisting of celebrities - although Mr Mashiach says there are guardrails around violent material. Each book consists of a printed disclaimer stating that it is fictional, produced by AI, and designed "entirely to bring humour and pleasure".

Legally, the copyright belongs to the company, but Mr Mashiach stresses that the item is planned as a "personalised gag gift", and the books do not get offered further.

He intends to expand his variety, generating various categories such as sci-fi, and maybe using an autobiography service. It's designed to be a light-hearted kind of customer AI - selling AI-generated products to human consumers.

It's likewise a bit terrifying if, like me, you write for a living. Not least due to the fact that it most likely took less than a minute to produce, and it does, certainly in some parts, sound just like me.

Musicians, wiki.rolandradio.net authors, artists and stars worldwide have actually expressed alarm about their work being used to train generative AI tools that then produce comparable material based upon it.

"We ought to be clear, when we are speaking about data here, we in fact indicate human developers' life works," says Ed Newton Rex, creator of Fairly Trained, which campaigns for AI companies to respect creators' rights.

"This is books, this is short articles, this is images. It's masterpieces. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to find out how to do something and after that do more like that."

In 2023 a tune featuring AI-generated voices of Canadian singers Drake and prawattasao.awardspace.info The Weeknd went viral on social media before being pulled from streaming platforms due to the fact that it was not their work and they had actually not consented to it. It didn't stop the track's developer trying to nominate it for a Grammy award. And although the artists were fake, it was still wildly popular.

"I do not think the use of generative AI for imaginative functions need to be prohibited, but I do think that generative AI for these purposes that is trained on people's work without approval should be banned," Mr Newton Rex adds. "AI can be really powerful but let's construct it morally and relatively."

OpenAI says Chinese rivals utilizing its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes industry and damages America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - consisting of the BBC - have selected to obstruct AI developers from trawling their online content for training purposes. Others have chosen to collaborate - the Financial Times has partnered with ChatGPT developer OpenAI for instance.

The UK federal government is thinking about an overhaul of the law that would permit AI designers to use creators' material on the web to assist develop their designs, unless the rights holders pull out.

Ed Newton Rex explains this as "insanity".

He points out that AI can make advances in areas like defence, healthcare and logistics without trawling the work of authors, reporters and artists.

"All of these things work without going and changing copyright law and ruining the incomes of the nation's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in your house of Lords, is also strongly versus eliminating copyright law for AI.

"Creative industries are wealth developers, 2.4 million jobs and a whole lot of pleasure," states the Baroness, who is also an advisor to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The government is weakening among its best carrying out industries on the unclear promise of growth."

A federal government spokesperson stated: "No move will be made till we are absolutely confident we have a practical plan that provides each of our objectives: increased control for best holders to help them accredit their material, access to top quality product to train leading AI designs in the UK, and more transparency for right holders from AI developers."

Under the UK federal government's brand-new AI plan, a national information library consisting of public information from a large variety of sources will likewise be offered to AI scientists.

In the US the future of federal rules to control AI is now up in the air following President Trump's return to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that intended to improve the safety of AI with, amongst other things, firms in the sector required to share information of the operations of their systems with the US government before they are released.

But this has actually now been rescinded by Trump. It stays to be seen what Trump will do rather, however he is said to want the AI sector to face less policy.

This comes as a variety of lawsuits against AI firms, and especially versus OpenAI, continue in the US. They have actually been secured by everyone from the New York Times to authors, music labels, and even a comedian.

They declare that the AI companies broke the law when they took their material from the web without their authorization, and utilized it to train their systems.

The AI business argue that their actions fall under "reasonable use" and are for that reason exempt. There are a variety of factors which can make up fair usage - it's not a straight-forward meaning. But the AI sector is under increasing examination over how it collects training data and whether it ought to be spending for it.

If this wasn't all sufficient to consider, Chinese AI company DeepSeek has actually shaken the sector over the past week. It became one of the most downloaded totally free app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek claims that it developed its technology for a fraction of the cost of the similarity OpenAI. Its success has actually raised security issues in the US, and threatens American's existing dominance of the sector.

When it comes to me and a profession as an author, I believe that at the moment, if I actually desire a "bestseller" I'll still need to compose it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the present weakness in generative AI tools for bigger projects. It has lots of errors and hallucinations, and it can be rather tough to read in parts because it's so verbose.

But provided how quickly the tech is developing, I'm uncertain how long I can stay confident that my considerably slower human writing and editing skills, are much better.

Register for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the most significant advancements in international technology, with analysis from BBC correspondents around the world.

Outside the UK? Sign up here.