Policy limit verification is the process of confirming the maximum amount an insurer is obligated to pay under a policy.
This information often determines the potential value of a claim, influences negotiation strategy, and helps shape litigation decisions. Without accurate verification, attorneys risk undervaluing cases, missing opportunities for settlement, or exposing clients to unnecessary financial risk.
Below, we will explore why policy limit verification matters, common challenges attorneys face, and essential tips for ensuring the process is done thoroughly and effectively.
Why Policy Limit Verification Matters
Establishing Case Value
The policy limit verification represents the ceiling of potential recovery from an insurer. Even if damages exceed the coverage, recovery is typically capped unless other sources of compensation are available (such as umbrella policies or personal assets). Knowing these limits upfront prevents unrealistic expectations and helps attorneys counsel clients effectively.
Guiding Negotiation Strategy
Insurance adjusters rarely disclose more than necessary. If attorneys do not verify policy limits, insurers may attempt to settle claims for far less than what is available. A verified limit arms the attorney with leverage in negotiations.
Preventing Bad Faith Tactics
In many jurisdictions, insurers are required to disclose policy limits upon reasonable request. If they refuse, delay, or provide inaccurate information, attorneys can use these tactics as evidence of bad faith in later proceedings. Verification ensures insurers are held accountable.
Ensuring Proper Settlement Authority
Attorneys need to confirm that the settlement demand aligns with available policy limits. Making a settlement demand higher than policy limits can be strategically useful in some circumstances, but it must be done with full knowledge of the insurance coverage landscape.
Challenges in Policy Limit Verification
While the concept is straightforward, obtaining accurate policy limits is not always simple. Some common obstacles include:
Insurer Non-Disclosure: Not all states require insurers to disclose policy limits without litigation. Attorneys may face resistance or vague responses.
Layered Coverage: Policies may involve multiple layers, such as primary, excess, or umbrella coverage, complicating the verification process.
Corporate Policies: For commercial defendants, policies may cover multiple entities or risks, creating ambiguity about available limits.
Exclusions and Endorsements: Even if a limit is stated, exclusions or endorsements can dramatically reduce effective coverage.
Client Misunderstandings: Clients themselves may not fully understand their own policy, especially in complex commercial cases.
Because of these challenges, attorneys must adopt a methodical approach to verification.
Essential Tips for Attorneys
1. Send a Formal Policy Limit Demand Letter
One of the first steps is to send a written request for disclosure. This letter should:
Cite applicable statutes or case law requiring disclosure.
Clearly request a certified copy of the policy, including all declarations, endorsements, and amendments.
Establish a record of the request, useful later if insurers delay or deny.
In states where disclosure is not automatic, attorneys can argue that refusal constitutes bad faith, especially when liability is clear, and damages are likely to exceed coverage.
2. Use State-Specific Disclosure Laws to Your Advantage
Insurance disclosure requirements vary widely. Some states mandate disclosure upon written request, while others only require it after filing suit. Attorneys must be familiar with local rules and use them strategically. For example:
California requires disclosure of policy limits within 30 days of a written request.
Florida mandates disclosure of policy limits before litigation in most personal injury cases.
New York has adopted rules requiring insurers to disclose complete information about policies, including erosion from other claims.
Knowing the law allows attorneys to press insurers for timely and complete disclosure.
3. Verify Beyond the Declarations Page
The declarations page often provides only a snapshot of coverage. Attorneys must request the entire policy, including endorsements and riders. Important details—such as per-occurrence limits, aggregate limits, and exclusions—are usually found in the fine print.
For example, a commercial general liability policy may list $1 million per occurrence on the declarations page, but an exclusion may eliminate coverage for certain claims (e.g., employment-related injuries or punitive damages). Without reviewing the full policy, attorneys risk overestimating coverage.
4. Investigate Excess and Umbrella Policies
Defendants may have multiple layers of coverage beyond their primary policy. These additional policies often provide significant recovery opportunities but may only activate after primary coverage is exhausted. Attorneys should:
Ask explicitly about excess and umbrella policies.
Confirm whether these policies “follow form” (i.e., adopt the same terms and exclusions as the primary policy).
Determine whether notice and procedural requirements apply.
Failure to uncover these policies can leave substantial funds untapped.
5. Consider Third-Party Discovery
When insurers refuse to cooperate voluntarily, attorneys can use discovery tools to compel disclosure. Subpoenas to insurance brokers, agents, or corporate risk managers can reveal coverage information. Depositions of claims adjusters or corporate representatives (under Rule 30(b)(6) in federal court) can also be effective.
6. Leverage Technology and Public Records
Insurance verification does not always rely solely on insurer cooperation. Attorneys can:
Search corporate filings for certificates of insurance.
Review prior litigation involving the defendant to see if policy information was disclosed.
Use specialized databases or investigative services to identify insurers and policies.
Technology makes it easier than ever to cross-check and corroborate insurance details.
7. Document All Efforts Meticulously
A paper trail is invaluable. Attorneys should keep records of all communications with insurers, including dates, names, and contents of conversations. This documentation strengthens potential bad faith claims if an insurer withholds information or misrepresents coverage.
8. Educate Clients About Policy Limits
Clients often assume that damages awarded will automatically be paid in full. Attorneys must explain the practical limitations of recovery, including:
The maximum available under insurance.
The possibility of pursuing personal assets if coverage is insufficient.
The likelihood of collecting above limits.
Educating clients prevents unrealistic expectations and improves trust.
9. Evaluate Coverage in Context of Comparative Fault
Even after verifying policy limits, attorneys must evaluate how liability allocation affects recovery. For example, if a policy provides $1 million in coverage but the insured is only 50% at fault, the effective recovery may be capped at $500,000.
Understanding how coverage interacts with comparative negligence and joint liability is essential for accurate case valuation.
10. Re-Verify Before Settlement
Policy limits can change during the life of a case. Payments to other claimants, defense costs, or policy erosion can reduce available coverage. Before finalizing a settlement, attorneys should request updated policy information to confirm the current available limits.
Conclusion
Policy limit verification is not a routine administrative task—it is a cornerstone of effective advocacy in personal injury and insurance litigation. Attorneys who fail to verify limits risk leaving significant compensation on the table or exposing clients to financial shortfalls.
By sending clear policy limit requests, understanding state disclosure laws, examining entire policies (not just declarations pages), investigating excess coverage, and using discovery tools when necessary, attorneys can ensure they have a complete picture of the coverage landscape.
Equally important is educating clients, documenting efforts, and re-verifying before settlement. When handled diligently, policy limit verification not only strengthens negotiation and litigation strategy but also safeguards clients’ interests.
Comments
0 comment